Are Scientists Nailing the Lid on Creation with Discovery?

http://buzz.yahoo.com/buzzlog/93068
Link above and read the article on new discovery of "Adi" before commenting.

I believe that "hammering a nail in creationism" is narrow-minded and truly short-sided. Our nation was founded on creationism, 'that all men are created equal'. These are the ideas that opened the door to our freedom, the constitution that liberals wish to permanently stifle. Do you really want to hammer a nail in that coffin, to become controlled by these types of thoughts? If I am merely a monkey, then what did I breed with to make me human-type? Scientists discover a few bones, and then suddenly holler there is "NO GOD, nail a lid on this theory"...It was approx. the time of Darwin that Mendell came out with his true answer through genetics, yet, Darwin got the attention from the his controversial POV and Mendell's works were mostly ignored until the 19th century. Mendell dealt with proven genetics not just philosophy. Mendell said there are a variety of limits in each 'kind'. Mendell and Pasteur put the nails in that coffin a long time ago-- a lid on "abiogenesis fallacy".

Mules can not be bred, they are at the end of their species. Some vegation have reached a limit like Lavender, it does not smell as sweet when seeded, but cuttings are used, thus nearing its end of species without human intervention.


My uncle saved the tomato, it was diseased and almost extinct, and would have been had he not found the cure. So, if you love tomatoes you can thank my uncle. Odd but true. He is listed at Purdue University as a noted genetics scientist, and is still studied in the horticulture books today. The tomato, like Adi, was chosen by nature to end. Therefore, without human or other intervention, a species ends, and suddenly there is the gap. A long pause. Then along comes a jaw bone? WOW, lets slap a human name on it, Lucy, and call it that--human. Again, a new species, it died out, and there is another void in evolution. See the pattern? There is no genetic link, despite our similarities to function. Just like the frog.

Basically Mendell states, you can have variety within the kinds, but that kinds will not produce or breed with another kind. Trees are still the same variety-- an oak does not become a pine!

Darwin thought you had spontaneous generation, that things developed out of dead things. He did not see the eggs that were laid there by insects. hatching into already existing species.

Sir Isaac Newtown and other Scientists said that creation was their founding principle of science as well. The facts support a creator by the means of how God used the natural world in the creative process to produce all that is, "bahrar", in Hebrew meaning, " He created the species from nothing". Gn. 1, 2.